hits counter
PhD in Parenting Google+ Facebook Pinterest Twitter StumbleUpon Slideshare YouTube
Recommended Reading

No Child Born to Die - Save the Children Canada Boycott Nestle


Search
GALLERIES
Blog Index
The journal that this archive was targeting has been deleted. Please update your configuration.
Navigation
Wednesday
Jan192011

Outrage: When parents cross the line



Where's the line?

The imaginary line. The line between "do what is best for your family" and "that is cruel, abusive, neglectful." Where is it?  Do you have one in your head? That dividing line between "not my cup of tea" and "wrong, wrong, wrong"?

I do. Sometimes. It shifts and moves a bit, but it is there. However, my line is not necessarily the same as your line and this is what I'm struggling with right now. I believe there is value in discussing what works and what doesn't work, what is beneficial and what is detrimental, what is valuable and what is useless. When we do that, however, it is almost always accompanied by cries of  "don't judge me."

I believe that leaving a baby to cry it out is cruel, that spanking is wrong, and that circumcision should be abolished.  Over the past week or so, I've heard people who have chosen those practices (by choice or in desperation) speak out against Chinese mothers who berate their children and force them to study and practice for hours on end. I've heard them chastise mothers who have a five year old's eyebrows waxed against her will for a beauty pageant. I've heard them express outrage at water torture techniques used on toddlers in polygamist communities. Why did they speak out against those things? Because they are better mothers? Because they have limits or standards too? Because the practices are abusive? I don't know.

I think water torture is on par with cry it out. I think spanking is on par with forced practice while being threatened. I think cutting off a piece of a child's penis is on par with waxing a child's eyebrows.  So yes, I am outraged by these things that everyone else is outraged by, but I must admit to being confused about why it is okay to critique some parenting techniques, but not others (yes, I get told how wrong and judgmental I am every time I critique something).  The only conclusion I can come to is that some of these are mainstream acceptable cruelties in the Western world and the others are outlandish things that only those strange Chinese, polygamists, or human show pony families do. Personally, just because something is widely done and accepted, doesn't make it acceptable to me.

There are extreme and less extreme versions of any of these parenting practices, for sure (e.g. graduated extinction cry it out versus let the baby cry until she vomits and beyond, make-up and a sexy outfit on a toddler versus forced eyebrow waxing and toddler lingerie). But I think that if it is acceptable to express outrage, then we need to realize that none of us is perfect and that not everyone's imaginary line is in the same place. We need to allow the dialogue and expression of opinion on both the things we are outraged by and the things that we may be doing in our own homes.  We also need to keep that dialogue respectful, regardless of whether we are criticizing our neighbour, a fellow blogger, or some anonymous woman on YouTube.

Image credit: Subharnab on flickr
« Dear Daughter | Main | How many dates before you request prenatal genetic testing? »

Reader Comments (103)

LOVE this post and many of the comments that follow.

Right up there with "don't judge me" and "agree to disagree" is "you don't know me / my family / my baby". No, of COURSE I do not...but that doesn't mean I'm going to ignore all logic and scientific data when discussing an issue.

It isn't as if I go searching for people to criticize. I'm just engaged in a conversation with some people, debating ideas, analyzing studies, etc.

Defensiveness when discussing an issue in the abstract amazes me. I know I have done things in less than ideal ways...sometimes because I just do not have the emotional or physical or financial resources, sometimes because I didn't know any better, and sometimes because I just don't prioritize these things. I don't see evidence that another way is better as an attack on me personally...I see it as information to analyze, evaluate, and to take into account in the future.

Observing that a recent study shows that not breastfeeding places a child at risk for certain problems does not mean you are attacking or criticizing a mother who cannot or chooses not to breastfeed. Pointing out that breastmilk is the normal food for babies does not fail to take into account the myriad of reasons why a mother may be unwilling / unable to breastfeed.

I'm more than willing to discuss the validity of a study and the conclusions and applications...even when the results point to a less than stellar choice I have made (having had epidurals with both my births so far, for example).

True, you all "don't know me"--but it is fair for someone to say that epidurals are not good for the baby have a range of potential side effects.

I am also, like another commenter, mystified as to why my choices must be taken as a commentary on the choices of others.

There is a line, as you say, between just not my style and abusive. Where I draw that line and on what issues, of course, may vary from where others do...but I at least strive to rely on some factual basis for my conclusions.

[...] bad parent. But I do want more freedom. I want the freedom to parent the way that I want to parent without society telling me what is right and wrong. I want the freedom to make choices that work for our family, whether that is because it is the [...]

[...] An older post from Annie at PhD in Parenting looks at the issue of judging parents in general. [...]

Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...